Table Topics Evaluator
Function:
The Topics Evaluator is responsible for the evaluation of the Table topics segment of the meeting.
If a long topics session is scheduled, two topics evaluators are sometimes appointed.
Preparation:
Discuss the theme(s) of the session with the Topics Master.
If two topics evaluators have been appointed, ensure that you both agree which speakers you are evaluating (odd and evens is the usual method).
As you will only have about 20 - 30 seconds to comment on each speaker, decide in advance the particular points that you will be looking out for.
At the meeting:
Take notes on each topics contribution and prepare a 20–30 second report on each.
When called upon by the Toastmaster, do NOT comment on the running of the topics session by the Topics Master and on the theme as the General Evaluator will do this later.
You should comment briskly on each individual contribution – there will probably only be time for 1 commendation, 1 recommendation and then 1 or 2 commendations.
Points that may be covered include:
Overall impression of the contribution / any obvious good (or bad) points
Construction - did the contribution have a beginning/middle/end?
Did the contribution stick to the subject given?
Quality of presentation/confidence/eye contact/vocal variety, etc.
Quality of content/interesting/original/informative/humorous
Recommendation(s) for improvement
You might want to make some general comments that were typical of several speakers.
Finally make a brief concluding comment on your overall impression of the session.